SINCE 1998
JULY 2026
Semi-Annual
Investor Letter
Dear Investor,

Source: Bloomberg

Data as at 14 July 2026 | Source: Bloomberg

1.DRAM: memory used in computers and AI chips, 2.HDD: Hard Drives used for storing large volumes of data.

Data as at 09 July 2026 | Source: Company filings

We believe the market is underestimating the long-term returns that AI investment will generate for leading technology companies.

This is already most visible in software development, where agentic coding systems can read a codebase, edit files, run tests, and coordinate sub-agents across separate tasks. The result is a meaningful step-change in AI capability, particularly in domains such as coding, mathematics, science, and research-heavy knowledge work.

The broader significance is that agentic systems are an important bridge toward Recursive Self-Improvement, or "RSI". RSI describes a feedback loop in which AI systems become capable enough to help improve the next generation of AI systems - through better code, better training methods, better evaluation, and better research productivity. OpenAI and Anthropic have recently said that more than 80% of their code is now being written by AI, with the next step in the process being the automation of AI research. We are approaching RSI. In our view, this is one of the key concepts that investors need to understand when assessing the pace, scale, and potential economic impact of the current AI cycle.

We discussed in our 2025 annual letter how capital expenditure by large tech companies was revised upwards massively during the second half of 2025 and this has continued in the first half of 2026. This trend became clear to us early in the year and we felt the best way to take advantage of this was to increase exposure to semiconductor companies that would be the recipients of these capex dollars, specifically the memory and Hard Drive manufacturers. This worked out very well, as the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) ended the first half of 2026 up more than 100%. The market has rapidly priced in the higher profits these companies will make over the next few years.

The key debate now is how long demand for semiconductors will exceed supply, and how long super profits will last in these businesses. Given the strong performance, we have sold a large part of our holdings in DRAM1 and HDD2 businesses, with most of our remaining exposure to this space sitting in TSMC, the dominant manufacturer of leading edge logic chips, where profitability swings are less volatile and where we expect durable long-term growth.

At current valuations, we believe these businesses are exceptionally attractive. The market is focusing heavily on the cost of AI infrastructure today, while giving too little credit to the revenue growth, productivity gains and strategic advantages that AI can unlock over the coming years. The key question is whether the significant capital expenditure incurred by these companies will ultimately result in attractive incremental returns – we think the answer is a resounding "yes".

We take a different view. While this investment cycle is clearly depressing near-term free cash flow, we believe the market is underestimating the medium-term benefits these businesses are likely to realise from AI. For the cloud service providers (Amazon, Google and Microsoft) the benefits should be most directly visible in cloud revenue growth, which has already shown signs of meaningful acceleration.

Several of our large consumer technology holdings, including Tencent and Meta, sold off meaningfully during the period, offsetting much of the gain we generated from our semiconductor exposure. The weakness reflected growing market concern about the scale of AI-related investment. Investors are questioning whether these companies are reinvesting too much of their current earnings and, in some cases, drawing on cash reserves or taking on debt, to fund compute infrastructure without a sufficiently visible near-term return.

*inception date is 1 February 2000
**inception date is 1 July 1998
***inception date is 1 April 2024

Data to 30 June 2026 | Source: Peregrine Capital, Morningstar

The stand-out event over the past 6 months was the US-Iran war that started on 28 February. The war and resultant spike in the oil price caused a concentrated decline in all 3 of the major themes we were excited about at the start of the year: the South African recovery story, store of value assets and AI. This caused one of the larger down months we have had in the funds' history during March.

Our view at the time was that there would be a delay to the South African recovery story and we cover how we tweaked portfolio exposure later on in this letter. The spike in oil prices also reversed some of the short-term momentum in store-of-value assets.

However, it was our very clear view that it did not have any material effect on the medium-term outlook and valuations of technology and semiconductor companies. The AI trend would continue and accelerate! (as covered in detail in the next section). 

So, while the drawdown in March was unfortunate, the funds fully retraced this during April as the market realised that the war would not impact all parts of the market equally. While drawdowns are never pleasant, they often provide great opportunities for those who can keep cool heads and take advantage of the opportunities provided.

The world is contending with two major forces at once: rising geopolitical uncertainty and the emergence of human-level machine intelligence.

The first half of 2026 was a difficult period for SA markets, with the JSE All Share Index ending down 3% for the 1H. The High Growth Fund was up 1.9% for the 1H, while the Pure Hedge Fund was up 1.2%, with the Vision Fund ending down 0.6%.

The past six months were, once again, eventful. The world is contending with two major forces at once: rising geopolitical uncertainty and the emergence of human-level machine intelligence. We believe the interaction of these forces will drive an extended period of exceptionally rapid change across the economic and political landscape. This will be a demanding, and genuinely interesting, environment for investors to navigate. All of us will need to adjust to a much faster pace of change than the world has been used to.

South Africa:
First Half 2026
Political and Markets Overview

Fortunately for the world, Trump realised this and we saw the first ceasefire agreed on 8 April. The Strait was still effectively closed until a seemingly more final ceasefire was reached on 15 June, leading to the re-opening of the strait.

During the first month of the conflict, oil spiked above $100 - a level that, if sustained, would materially impact emerging markets like South Africa. It has since retreated to the high $80s at the time of writing. The global fuel supply situation has been exacerbated by recent Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian refining capacity, which have further tightened the supply of liquid fuels. Given that South Africa now imports around 65% of its liquid fuel requirements, this is very negative for the country's balance of payments, inflation outlook and growth potential. Negotiations between the USA and Iran have broken down, hostilities are escalating as we write, and it remains unclear how, or on what timeline, this crisis will be resolved.

We have written about AI in our investor letters since 2022, and given the rate of progress over the past six months, it seems quite likely we will never again write one without commenting on AI and its impact on the world.

While earlier AI tools were largely conversational assistants, the latest systems are beginning to operate more like digital workers: they can take a high-level objective, break it into sub-tasks, run multiple workstreams in parallel, use external tools, and iterate toward a finished result.

Geopolitics:
AI:
In Review
Fund Performance

The year started with a bang as the US captured the Venezuelan president on the 3rd of January. The success of this operation from a US perspective probably influenced the decision to go to war with Iran. The US and Israel did real damage to the Iranian military during the conflict, but they underestimated the leverage Iran could obtain by closing the Strait of Hormuz, impacting about 15% of global oil production. This meant that there was real pressure on the US to keep the conflict short, as an extended conflict would see the oil stockpiles fall to dangerously low levels which would eventually cause a huge spike in oil prices.

A durable resolution to the conflict would change this quickly - but until then, the oil price remains the single biggest swing factor for the SA macro outlook.

We were particularly optimistic about the SA macro-outlook at the start of the year based on high gold and platinum prices, muted oil prices as well as the potential for continued cuts in interest rates. Gold has since fallen back to around $4,000 after briefly going as high as $5,500 at the start of the year, while platinum is back at $1,600 after peaking briefly above $2,600. These are still somewhat attractive levels for South Africa, but will not quite have the benefit on the trade surplus and government revenue at current levels vs the January peaks.

We initially reduced and hedged some of our South African exposure as the conflict started, given the risk to the SA economic outlook if high oil prices persisted. 

The picture for South Africa remains unclear. With oil back in the high $80s and hostilities escalating, the meaningful petrol and diesel price relief we had hoped for is unlikely to materialise in the near term, and fuel prices will continue to put upward pressure on inflation. A durable resolution to the conflict would change this quickly - but until then, the oil price remains the single biggest swing factor for the SA macro outlook.

The US-Iran conflict highlighted the strategic importance of oil, with the Strait of Hormuz becoming the key variable for global markets.

It seems quite likely we will never again write an investor letter without commenting on AI and its impact on the world.

We expect the sector to remain volatile, which should provide a rich hunting ground.

Outlook

Within days, the US government issued an export-control directive barring foreign access and forcing Anthropic to pull both models entirely, including for users here in South Africa. Two and a half weeks later, after Anthropic agreed to a set of security commitments, access was restored. The precedent is now set: frontier AI is being treated as a national security asset, and government action has become a variable that anyone investing in or around this sector needs to price in.

We are very excited about the outlook for our larger technology
holdings, especially at current valuations.At the same time, we are also well positioned to take advantage of pull backs in the semiconductor space after locking in, in the second half of June, a material part of our gains. We expect the sector to remain volatile, which should provide a rich hunting ground.

Thank you, as always, for your trust and your long-term mindset. Faster change, more government involvement and more volatility all reward patient capital, and having investors who share that horizon allows us to treat volatility as opportunity rather than threat. We look forward to reporting back at year end.
We expect an eventful second half of the year. AI progress will continue at a rapid rate, but the forward-looking debate has already moved on from whether governments will get worried about the speed of progress, to how far they will go in controlling it. June gave us the first real case study. Anthropic had initially restricted its most capable model, Mythos, to a small group of trusted partners because of its cyber capabilities, and released a more guard-railed public version, Fable 5, in early June.

With Thanks

Please contact us via ask@peregrine.co.za if you have any questions or comments.

We thank you for your commitment to the long term and for the trust you have placed in us.

***Fund Name

Inception date

Highest annual return

Lowest annual return

Vision Fund

April 2024

36.52%

9.57%

HFRX Equity hedge Index

April 2024

14.64%

4.52%

**Fund Name

Inception date

Highest annual return

Lowest annual return

Pure Hedge Fund

July 1998

133.81%

0.59%

ASISA South Africa MA Low Equity

July 1998

40.59%

-3.10%

*Fund Name

Inception date

Highest annual return

Lowest annual return

High Growth Fund

Feb 2000

71.61%

-16.20%

ASISA South Africa High Low Equity

Feb 2000

39.47%

-14.75%

FTSE/JSE Capped Swix All Share Index

Feb 2000

73.00%

-37.59%

Important Information

The calculation of all net returns from 1 February 2000 until 30 November 2016 relates to the Peregrine High Growth Fund, prior to its inclusion under CISCA. Thereafter, the data relates to the Peregrine Capital High Growth QI Hedge Fund* (“High Growth Fund”). The calculation of all net returns from 1 July 1998 until 30 November 2016 relates to the Peregrine Pure Hedge Fund, prior to its inclusion under CISCA. Thereafter, the data relates to the Peregrine Capital Pure Hedge QI Hedge Fund** (“Pure Hedge Fund”).The ‘JSE Capped Swix All Share Index’ referenced is the index from December 2016 to date, before that the JSE All Share TR Index is used.
Data to 30 June 2026 I Source:Peregrine Capital, Morningstar, Bloomberg
Peregrine Capital Collective Investments (RF) Proprietary Limited (“PCCI”) is a registered and approved manager of collective investment schemes in hedge funds. Peregrine Capital Proprietary Limited (“Peregrine Capital”), is an authorised Financial Services Provider (FSP 607) under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, No. 37 of 2002 and has been appointed as the investment manager or sub-investment manager of the portfolios.Performance information and comparisons shown reflects historical returns and is provided for informational and comparative purposes only. Collective investment schemes are medium to long-term investments. The value of participatory interests or the investment may go down as well as up. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Collective investment schemes are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from PCCI or Peregrine Capital. Neither PCCI nor Peregrine Capital provides any guarantee with respect to the capital or return of a portfolio. PCCI retains full legal responsibility for the applicable portfolios. PCCI has the right to close the portfolios to new clients to manage them more efficiently in accordance with their mandates. The Peregrine Capital Vision Fund Segregated Portfolio (the “Vision Fund”) is approved under section 65 of the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act No. 45 of 2002 (“CISCA”) as a regulated collective investment scheme in hedge funds and is subject to the regulatory requirements applicable to such schemes. Peregrine Capital High Growth QI Hedge Fund: Performance fees are payable on positive performance using a participation rate of 20%. A high watermark is applied, which ensures that performance fees will only be charged on new performance. There is no cap on the Rand amount of performance fees. Peregrine Capital Pure Hedge QI Hedge Fund: Performance fees are payable on positive performance, in excess of the hurdle, using a participation rate of 20%. A high watermark is applied, which ensures that performance fees will only be charged on new performance. There is no cap on the Rand amount of performance fees. The Vision Fund: Performance fees are payable on positive performance using a participation rate of 20%. A high watermark is applied, which ensures that performance fees will only be charged on new performance. There is no cap on the USD amount of performance fees. Performance has been calculated using net NAV to NAV numbers with income re-invested. Individual investor investment performance may differ as a result of initial fees (if applicable), the actual investment date, reinvestment timing, distribution dates, or applicable taxes. Where periods of longer than 1 year are used in calculating past performance, certain figures may be annualised. Annualised performance is the average return per year over the period. Actual annual figures and investment performance calculations are available on request atinfo@peregrine.co.za.The performance calculated and shown is that of the portfolio, based on a lump sum contribution on the inception date of the fund. The investment performance for each period shown reflects the net return for clients who have been fully invested for that period. The performance history is contained in the portfolios’ minimum disclosure documents, which are available at www.peregrine.co.za
SINCE 1998
JULY 2026
Semi-Annual
Investor Letter

At current valuations, we believe these businesses are exceptionally attractive. The market is focusing heavily on the cost of AI infrastructure today, while giving too little credit to the revenue growth, productivity gains and strategic advantages that AI can unlock over the coming years. The key question is whether the significant capital expenditure incurred by these companies will ultimately result in attractive incremental returns – we think the answer is a resounding "yes".

Data as at 09 July 2026 | Source: Company fillings

We take a different view. While this investment cycle is clearly depressing near-term free cash flow, we believe the market is underestimating the medium-term benefits these businesses are likely to realise from AI. For the cloud service providers (Amazon, Google and Microsoft) the benefits should be most directly visible in cloud revenue growth, which has already shown signs of meaningful acceleration.

Several of our large consumer technology holdings, including Tencent and Meta, sold off meaningfully during the period, offsetting much of the gain we generated from our semiconductor exposure. The weakness reflected growing market concern about the scale of AI-related investment. Investors are questioning whether these companies are reinvesting too much of their current earnings and, in some cases, drawing on cash reserves or taking on debt, to fund compute infrastructure without a sufficiently visible near-term return.

Source: Bloomberg

The world is contending with two major forces at once: rising geopolitical uncertainty and the emergence of human-level machine intelligence.

The first half of 2026 was a difficult period for SA markets, with the JSE All Share Index ending down 3% for the 1H. The High Growth Fund was up 1.9% for the 1H, while the Pure Hedge Fund was up 1.2%, with the Vision Fund ending down 0.6%.

The past six months were, once again, eventful. The world is contending with two major forces at once: rising geopolitical uncertainty and the emergence of human-level machine intelligence. We believe the interaction of these forces will drive an extended period of exceptionally rapid change across the economic and political landscape. This will be a demanding, and genuinely interesting, environment for investors to navigate. All of us will need to adjust to a much faster pace of change than the world has been used to.

1.DRAM: memory used in computers and AI chips,
2.HDD: Hard Drives used for storing large volumes of data.

The key debate now is how long demand for semiconductors will exceed supply, and how long super profits will last in these businesses. Given the strong performance, we have sold a large part of our holdings in DRAM1 and HDD2 businesses, with most of our remaining exposure to this space sitting in TSMC, the dominant manufacturer of leading edge logic chips, where profitability swings are less volatile and where we expect durable long-term growth.

We discussed in our 2025 annual letter how capital expenditure by large tech companies was revised upwards massively during the second half of 2025 and this has continued in the first half of 2026. This trend became clear to us early in the year and we felt the best way to take advantage of this was to increase exposure to semiconductor companies that would be the recipients of these capex dollars, specifically the memory and Hard Drive manufacturers. This worked out very well, as the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) ended the first half of 2026 up more than 100%. The market has rapidly priced in the higher profits these companies will make over the next few years.

We have written about AI in our investor letters since 2022, and given the rate of progress over the past six months, it seems quite likely we will never again write one without commenting on AI and its impact on the world.

While earlier AI tools were largely conversational assistants, the latest systems are beginning to operate more like digital workers: they can take a high-level objective, break it into sub-tasks, run multiple workstreams in parallel, use external tools, and iterate toward a finished result.

AI:
First Half 2026
Political and Markets Overview

Data as at 14 July 2026 | Source: Bloomberg

Fortunately for the world, Trump realised this and we saw the first ceasefire agreed on 8 April. The Strait was still effectively closed until a seemingly more final ceasefire was reached on 15 June, leading to the
re-opening of the strait.

During the first month of the conflict,
oil spiked above $100 - a level that,
if sustained, would materially impact emerging markets like South Africa.
It has since retreated to the high $80s
at the time of writing. The global fuel supply situation has been exacerbated by recent Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian refining capacity, which have further tightened the supply of liquid fuels. Given that South Africa now imports around 65% of its liquid fuel requirements, this is very negative for the country's balance of payments, inflation outlook and growth potential. Negotiations between the USA and Iran have broken down, hostilities are escalating as we write, and it remains unclear how, or on what timeline,
this crisis will be resolved.

Geopolitics:

The stand-out event over the past 6 months was the US-Iran war that started on 28 February. The war and resultant spike in the oil price caused a concentrated decline in all 3 of the major themes we were excited about at the start of the year: the South African recovery story, store of value assets and AI. This caused one of the larger down months we have had in the funds' history during March.

Our view at the time was that there would be a delay to the South African recovery story and we cover how we tweaked portfolio exposure later on in this letter. The spike in oil prices also reversed some of the short-term momentum in store-of-value assets.

However, it was our very clear view that it did not have any material effect on the medium-term outlook and valuations of technology and semiconductor companies. The AI trend would continue and accelerate! (as covered in detail in the next section). 

So, while the drawdown in March was unfortunate, the funds fully retraced this during April as the market realised that the war would not impact all parts of the market equally. While drawdowns are never pleasant, they often provide great opportunities for those who can keep cool heads and take advantage of the opportunities provided.

The year started with a bang as the US captured the Venezuelan president on the 3rd of January. The success of this operation from a US perspective probably influenced the decision to go to war with Iran. The US and Israel did real damage to the Iranian military during the conflict, but they underestimated the leverage Iran could obtain by closing the Strait of Hormuz, impacting about 15% of global oil production. This meant that there was real pressure on the US to keep the conflict short, as an extended conflict would see the oil stockpiles fall to dangerously low levels which would eventually cause a huge spike in oil prices.

The US-Iran conflict highlighted the strategic importance of oil, with
the Strait of Hormuz becoming the key variable for global markets.

South Africa:
We were particularly optimistic about the SA macro-outlook at the start of the year based on high gold and platinum prices, muted oil prices as well as the potential for continued cuts in interest rates. Gold has since fallen back to around $4,000 after briefly going as high as $5,500 at the start of the year, while platinum is back at $1,600 after peaking briefly above $2,600. These are still somewhat attractive levels for South Africa, but will not quite have the benefit on the trade surplus and government revenue at current levels vs the January peaks.

We initially reduced and hedged some of our South African exposure as the conflict started, given the risk to the SA economic outlook if high oil prices persisted. 

The picture for South Africa remains unclear. With oil back in the high $80s and hostilities escalating, the meaningful petrol and diesel price relief we had hoped for is unlikely to materialise in the near term, and fuel prices will continue to put upward pressure on inflation. A durable resolution to the conflict would change this quickly - but until then, the oil price remains the single biggest swing factor for the SA macro outlook.
Fund Performance
In Review
Dear Investor,
Within days, the US government issued an export-control directive barring foreign access and forcing Anthropic to pull both models entirely, including for users here in South Africa. Two and a half weeks later, after Anthropic agreed to a set of security commitments, access was restored. The precedent is now set: frontier AI is being treated as a national security asset, and government action has become a variable that anyone investing in or around this sector needs to price in.

We are very excited about the outlook for our larger technology
holdings, especially at current valuations. At the same time, we are also well positioned to take advantage of pull backs in the semiconductor space after locking in, in the second half of June, a material part of our gains. We expect the sector to remain volatile, which should provide a rich hunting ground.

Thank you, as always, for your trust and your long-term mindset. Faster change, more government involvement and more volatility all reward patient capital, and having investors who share that horizon allows us to treat volatility as opportunity rather than threat. We look forward to reporting back at year end.
We expect an eventful second half of the year. AI progress will continue at a rapid rate, but the forward-looking debate has already moved on from whether governments will get worried about the speed of progress, to how far they will go in controlling it. June gave us the first real case study. Anthropic had initially restricted its most capable model, Mythos, to a small group of trusted partners because of its cyber capabilities, and released a more guard-railed public version, Fable 5, in early June.

Outlook

We thank you for your commitment to the long term and for the trust you have placed in us.

Please contact us via ask@peregrine.co.za if you have any questions or comments.

With Thanks

*Fund Name

Inception date

Highest annual return

Lowest annual return

Vision Fund

July 1998

36.52%

14.64%

ASISA South Africa MA Low Equity

July 1998

9.57%

4.52%

*Fund Name

Inception date

Highest annual return

Lowest annual return

Pure Hedge Fund

July 1998

133.81%

40.59%

ASISA South Africa MA Low Equity

July 1998

0.59%

-3.10%

*Fund Name

Inception date

Highest annual return

Lowest annual return

High Growth Fund

Feb 2000

71.61%

39.47%

ASISA South Africa High Low Equity

Feb 2000

-16.20%

-14.75%

FTSE/JSE Capped Swix All Share Index

Feb 2000

73.00%

-37.59%

The calculation of all net returns from 1 February 2000 until 30 November 2016 relates to the Peregrine High Growth Fund, prior to its inclusion under CISCA. Thereafter, the data relates to the Peregrine Capital High Growth QI Hedge Fund* (“High Growth Fund”). The calculation of all net returns from 1 July 1998 until 30 November 2016 relates to the Peregrine Pure Hedge Fund, prior to its inclusion under CISCA. Thereafter, the data relates to the Peregrine Capital Pure Hedge QI Hedge Fund** (“PureHedge Fund”).The ‘JSE Capped Swix All Share Index’ referenced is the index from December 2016 to date, before that the JSE All Share TR Index is used.
The ‘Cash’ referenced is the STeFI Index (Stefocad) from July 2003 to date, before that the JIBAR is used.

Data to 30 June 2026 I Source:Peregrine Capital, Morningstar, Bloomberg
Peregrine Capital Collective Investments (RF) Proprietary Limited (“PCCI”) is a registered and approved manager of collective investment schemes in hedge funds. Peregrine Capital Proprietary Limited (“Peregrine Capital”), is an authorised Financial Services Provider (FSP 607) under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, No. 37 of 2002 and has been appointed as the investment manager or sub-investment manager of the portfolios.Performance information and comparisons shown reflects historical returns and is provided for informational and comparative purposes only. Collective investment schemes are medium to long-term investments. The value of participatory interests or the investment may go down as well as up. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Collective investment schemes are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from PCCI or Peregrine Capital. Neither PCCI nor Peregrine Capital provides any guarantee with respect to the capital or return of a portfolio. PCCI retains full legal responsibility for the applicable portfolios. PCCI has the right to close the portfolios to new clients to manage them more efficiently in accordance with their mandates. The Peregrine Capital Vision Fund Segregated Portfolio (the “Vision Fund”) is approved under section 65 of the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act No. 45 of 2002 (“CISCA”) as a regulated collective investment scheme in hedge funds and is subject to the regulatory requirements applicable to such schemes. Peregrine Capital High Growth QI Hedge Fund: Performance fees are payable on positive performance using a participation rate of 20%. A high watermark is applied, which ensures that performance fees will only be charged on new performance. There is no cap on the Rand amount of performance fees. Peregrine Capital Pure Hedge QI Hedge Fund: Performance fees are payable on positive performance, in excess of the hurdle, using a participation rate of 20%. A high watermark is applied, which ensures that performance fees will only be charged on new performance. There is no cap on the Rand amount of performance fees. The Vision Fund: Performance fees are payable on positive performance using a participation rate of 20%. A high watermark is applied, which ensures that performance fees will only be charged on new performance. There is no cap on the USD amount of performance fees. Performance has been calculated using net NAV to NAV numbers with income re-invested. Individual investor investment performance may differ as a result of initial fees (if applicable), the actual investment date, reinvestment timing, distribution dates, or applicable taxes. Where periods of longer than 1 year are used in calculating past performance, certain figures may be annualised. Annualised performance is the average return per year over the period. Actual annual figures and investment performance calculations are available on request atinfo@peregrine.co.za.The performance calculated and shown is that of the portfolio, based on a lump sum contribution on the inception date of the fund. The investment performance for each period shown reflects the net return for clients who have been fully invested for that period. The performance history is contained in the portfolios’ minimum disclosure documents, which are available at www.peregrine.co.za

Important Information